Climate ethics and climate justice in the context of the Global South
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38154/cjas.17Keywords:
ethics, environmental ethics, climate justiceAbstract
The fact that those most affected by the climate crisis are those who are least affected by it forms the basis of climate justice. This study examines climate justice and climate ethics policies and practices by addressing the Americas, Asia and Africa continents. Considering that climate justice cannot be considered separately from climate ethics and that this is an ethical issue at the same time, it is aimed to deal with climate ethics and climate justice debates based on environmental ethics understandings. As a method, literature review was made, climate justice searches and examples were evaluated based on the conceptual framework and ethical foundations. As a result, if the moral interest turns towards ecocentrism, who is responsible for the climate crisis, which species, which classes and which living and non-living things in the ecosystem are most affected by this crisis, who and/or what should be protected, and the rights of future generations should be taken into consideration. Questions such as who will undertake the protection mission gain weight. With this holistic perspective to be created, it will be possible to seek a solution to the climate crisis in which responsibilities for the entire ecosystem are shared, ethical values come to the fore, and the concepts of fairness and justice find their place for all living and non-living beings. The ethical understanding to be formed within the framework of the answers to these questions constitutes the basis of both climate ethics and climate justice. Therefore, it seems inevitable that with the climate ethics approach to be adopted within the framework of these questions, it is inevitable to establish an understanding of global climate justice that includes living and non-living things in the field of moral interest, interspecies, international, inter-class, intra-generational and intergenerational global climate justice.
References
Algan, Nesrin. 2008. “İklim Etiği”. Mülkiye Dergisi. XXXII (259): 191-204.
Bali Principles of Climate Justice. International Climate Justice Network. 2002. Erişim Tarihi: 23.09.2021. https://corpwatch.org/article/bali-principles-climate-justice.
Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi ve Kyoto Protokolü. 2006. Bölgesel Çevre Merkezi REC Türkiye Yayını. Ankara.
Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi’nin 21. Taraflar Konferansı-COP 21: Paris Anlaşması. 2016. Ed.: Ilgın Özkaya Özlüer, Ethemcan Turhan, Fevzi Özlüer. Ekoloji Kolektifi Derneği Yayını. Ankara.
Centre for Civil Society. “What is Climate Justice?”. Erişim Tarihi: 30.09.2021. http://ccs.ukzn.ac.za/default.asp?4,80,5,2381.
Siyada. 2020. “Climate Justice for Africa A New Africa is Possible”. Erişim Tarihi: 14.12.2021. https://www.siyada.org/en/siyada-board/statements/climate-justice-for-africa-a-new-africa-is-possible/.
Des Jardins, J.R. 2006. Çevre Etiği. Çev. R. Keleş. İmge Yayınevi. Ankara.
Doğru, Barış. 2019. İklim Mücadelesinde Ekonomik, Sosyal ve Ekolojik Adalet. İklim Değişikliği Alanında Ortak Çabaların Desteklenmesi Projesi (iklimİN). İklim Değişikliği Eğitim Modülleri Serisi: 16.
Ertan, Birol. 2004. “2000’li Yıllarda Çevre Etiği Yaklaşımları ve Türkiye”. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi. (1: 3): 1-17.
Ertan Akkoyunlu, Kıvılcım. 2015. “Leopoldcü Düşünce ve Yeryüzü (Toprak) Etiği”. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim (MSY) Dergisi. 10(23): 1-20.
IPCC. 2015. Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. Erişim Tarihi: 05.10.2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf.
Kadıoğlu, Mikdat. 2008. “Küresel İklim Değişimi ve Etik”. TMMOB İklim Değişimi Sempozyumu. 13-Ankara, 393-424.
Karakitapoğlu, Emine Behiye. 2017. “İklim Göçmenleri”. Erişim Tarihi: 17.11.2021. https://acikradyo.com.tr/acik-gazete/iklim-gocmenleri.
Karapınar, Barış. 2018. “İklim Değişikliği ve Tarım”. Sürdürülebilir Tarım İlkeleri İyi Uygulamalar Rehberi. İş Dünyası ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Derneği Yayını. İstanbul.
Kaya, Yasemin. 2017. “Paris Anlaşmasını İklim Adaleti Perspektifinden Değerlendirmek”, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 14(54): 87-106.
Leopold, Aldo. “Thinking Like A Mountain”. Erişim Tarihi: 15.10.2021. http://www.eco-action.org/dt/thinking.html.
Oslo Principles On Global Climate Change Obligations. 2015. Erişim Tarihi: 18.10.2021. https://globaljustice.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/OsloPrinciples.pdf.
Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich ve ark. 2016. “Differential Climate Impacts For Policy-Relevant Limits To Global Warming: The Case Of 1.5 ◦C And 2 ◦C Earth System Dynamics”. 327-351.
Stone, Christopher D. 1974. “Should Trees Have Standing? –Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects”. Southern California Law Review. 45: 450-501.
Tatgın, Ezgi. 2019. “İklim Adaleti Kapsamında Toplumsal Cinsiyet Tartışması”. Kent ve Çevre Araştırmaları Dergisi. 1(1): 104-118.
The New Climate Economy. 2018. Unlocking The Inclusive Growth Story of the 21st Century: Accelerating Climate Action in Urgent Times. The 2018 Report of the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate. Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2021. https://newclimateeconomy.report/.
Tokar, Brian. 2014. İklim Adaletine Doğru. Öteki Yayınevi. İstanbul.
TÜİK. 2020. Sera Gazı Emisyon İstatistikleri Bülteni: 1990-2018. 33624.
UN WFP. 2021. “Climate Shock: The Human Toll of the Climate Crisis in Africa”.
WWF. 2018. “Half of Plant and Animal Species at Risk From Climate Change in World’s Most Important Natural Places”, Erişim Tarihi: 19.11.2021. https://www.worldwildlife.org/press-releases/half-of-plant-and-animal-species-at-risk-from-climate-change-in-world-s-most-important-natural-places.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aygül Akkuş

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY Licence, you can share (copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon) the material, for any purpose, even commercially.
CJAS does not revoke these freedoms as long as you follow these license terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.




Follow us on Twitter.
